Are the WAV files higher quality and worth the extra cost if the files are being downloaded to make a cd?
Thanks!
Juno 320 MP3 vs WAV
-
- Euro To B
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 21 Feb 2006, 18:34
- Location: Ohio
Fixed for truth. There's almost no scenario where the 192 file is going to sound appreciably different from the 320 file. At those bitrates, things like pre-echo and other artifacts are a failing of the codec's psychoacoustic model and don't go away when you throw more bits at them.Lebon14 wrote:WAV are lossless files. If you are an audiophile, buy the lossless. Otherwise, buy the MP3 192 to save money.
No. There is hearable difference between 192 and 320. Only people using small mp3 player or "mighty" ipod cannot hear the difference.pokecapn wrote:Fixed for truth. There's almost no scenario where the 192 file is going to sound appreciably different from the 320 file. At those bitrates, things like pre-echo and other artifacts are a failing of the codec's psychoacoustic model and don't go away when you throw more bits at them.Lebon14 wrote:WAV are lossless files. If you are an audiophile, buy the lossless. Otherwise, buy the MP3 192 to save money.
...I remember that time...
D I A B O L I K
D I A B O L I K
- SuperEuroJimmy
- Mudkip Fan
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: 15 Feb 2006, 00:28
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
-
- Eurohero
- Posts: 847
- Joined: 10 Feb 2007, 12:44
- Location: Cambridge, United Kingdom
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 0 guests