Page 2 of 2

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 05:02
by drnrg
Wow! it's all digitalized nowadays. huh? Sorta takes away the fun of mixing in the first place. At least for me it would. I still think old skool mixing is the best. You can really hear how one song morphs into the other. I remeber thinking parts of one song belong to another and vice vesra when I heard the transitions in the good old days. 8)

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 10:41
by Hiroki Hub
[quote="drnrg"]Wow! it's all digitalized nowadays. huh? Sorta takes away the fun of mixing in the first place. At least for me it would. I still think old skool mixing is the best. You can really hear how one song morphs into the other. I remeber thinking parts of one song belong to another and vice vesra when I heard the transitions in the good old days. 8)[/quote

I would do it the traditional way, but I have absolutely no idea how to, nor do I have the equipment for it :/

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 16:40
by SuperEuroJimmy
drnrg wrote:Wow! it's all digitalized nowadays. huh? Sorta takes away the fun of mixing in the first place. At least for me it would. I still think old skool mixing is the best. You can really hear how one song morphs into the other. I remeber thinking parts of one song belong to another and vice vesra when I heard the transitions in the good old days. 8)
Well, this is actually the old skool mixing way. The only thing the computes does is transcode the sine wave into the song you're actually playing. :)
The part you're missing here is picking up the vinyl and replacing it with another one. :)
Check this video and it might make some sense; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4pkPIFsvgo

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 19:11
by Hiroki Hub
MKwiakaku wrote:
drnrg wrote:Wow! it's all digitalized nowadays. huh? Sorta takes away the fun of mixing in the first place. At least for me it would. I still think old skool mixing is the best. You can really hear how one song morphs into the other. I remeber thinking parts of one song belong to another and vice vesra when I heard the transitions in the good old days. 8)
Well, this is actually the old skool mixing way. The only thing the computes does is transcode the sine wave into the song you're actually playing. :)
The part you're missing here is picking up the vinyl and replacing it with another one. :)
Check this video and it might make some sense; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4pkPIFsvgo
Seems to complicated for me :(
Maybe I should stick to making mixes the way I have been :|

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 22:31
by Bonkers
Well, you can still mix the old skool way, you just don't have the vinyl; you're using the mp3 version of the extended. DJs have been doing that since around 1997. Old Skool mixing simply applies to mixing outro/intro.


Today's DJs have no idea of the skill behind mixing, but on the flip side, old skool "vinyl" DJs have no idea of the skill behind working the diverse technological advances of mixers & tracktor controllers.

Posted: 17 Sep 2016, 04:02
by drnrg
MKwiakaku wrote:
drnrg wrote:Wow! it's all digitalized nowadays. huh? Sorta takes away the fun of mixing in the first place. At least for me it would. I still think old skool mixing is the best. You can really hear how one song morphs into the other. I remeber thinking parts of one song belong to another and vice vesra when I heard the transitions in the good old days. 8)
Well, this is actually the old skool mixing way. The only thing the computes does is transcode the sine wave into the song you're actually playing. :)
The part you're missing here is picking up the vinyl and replacing it with another one. :)
Check this video and it might make some sense; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4pkPIFsvgo
No wonder you have all these boatload of deejay's coming out of nowhere. That program makes it soooooooo easy to mix. You don't even have to hassle to sync the correct speeds of each song. If I had that cash I might buy that traktor just to have more options, but I think I still prefer the raw style of vinyl mixing. Old habits die hard. :wink:

Posted: 23 Sep 2016, 14:48
by Markos
Lebon14 wrote:
para_rigby wrote:What do we know about the studio that produced songs for that album series?
If I get enough cash one day, I'll buy a copy off discogs and find out.
Might not want to bother, there seems to be no information at all.

http://postimg.org/image/aj9hvr319/

Posted: 23 Sep 2016, 15:33
by Lebon14
Markos wrote:Might not want to bother, there seems to be no information at all.

http://postimg.org/image/aj9hvr319/
Heh. Even then, I'll get it coz FLAC and rarity.

Posted: 23 Sep 2016, 16:27
by Markos
yeah it its a nice cd :grin: